![]() ![]() It gets even trickier when companies consider their Scope 3 emissions – those created across the life cycle of their products and services, both in terms of the upstream inputs and from their use. Many companies have chosen to make their offices and business travel carbon neutral, or to seek carbon neutrality for a particular product, rather than claiming to be a fully carbon-neutral company.Ī narrow scope might be appropriate for a law firm, for instance, if office energy consumption and travel accounts for the vast majority of its carbon footprint, but such a boundary would make little sense for an airline or a retailer. Setting the scopeĪ key question for a company setting either of these goals is defining the scope of the activities included. Ideally, a company on a net-zero trajectory would choose to pursue carbon neutrality until it reaches its net-zero objective. These can then be offset with high-quality carbon credits from activities that remove carbon from the atmosphere. This should result in something like a 90% decrease in emissions, with a limited volume of residual emissions from activities that are impossible to decarbonise. ![]() A net-zero commitment implies a “radical emissions reduction trajectory”, he adds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |